[Blog Update] SQLServerFAQ posts for October

Here are my posts on the MSDN blog SQLServerFAQ for the month of October.

A guide to troubleshooting tempdb growth due to Version Store usage:

Troubleshooting tempdb growth due to Version Store usage

An email chain with Jonathan (Blog | Twitter) resulted in this blog post:

Troubleshooting specific Login Failed error messages

A much needed VDI troubleshooting tool called SQL Server Backup Simulator:

SQL Server Backup Simulator


Misconceptions around –T1118

There has been a lot on debate on whether having the same number of tempdb data files as the number of physical cores help a SQL instance in case you are facing Latch Contention issues on tempdb. This is typically seen with the wait-resource in the sysprocesses or sys.dm_exec_requests (depending on what you use to monitor blocking) output with values like 2:1:X or 2:2:X with having non-zero waittimes.

An article was published for this particular issue which asked you to enable –T1118 and split the tempdb to have multiple data files:

328551    Concurrency enhancements for the tempdb database

This trace flag switches allocations in tempdb from single-page at a time for the first 8 pages, to immediately allocate an extent (8 pages). It’s used to help alleviate allocation bitmap contention in tempdb under a heavy load of small temp table creation and deletion.

Furthermore, with the advent of new monster systems having 64 processors (16 quad cores) and 128GB of RAM, would it make sense to split the tempdb into multiple files for SQL Server 2005 and 2008. One of the things that is not commonly known as mentioned by Paul in his post below is that on SQL Server 2005 and 2008, there is a temp table cache that is maintained for temp tables created on the instance. In case, your temp table creation workload is very high, enabling –TF1118 wouldn’t benefit you.

A quote from that post:

As far as data files go though, the number has changed. Instead of a 1-1 mapping between processor cores and tempdb data files (*IF* there’s latch contention), now you don’t need so many – so the recommendation from the SQL team is the number of data files should be 1/4 to 1/2 the number of processor cores (again, only *IF* you have latch contention). The SQL CAT team has also found that in 2005 and 2008, there’s usually no gain from having more than 8 tempdb data files, even for systems with larger numbers of processor cores. Warning: generalization – your mileage may vary – don’t post a comment saying this is wrong because your system benefits from 12 data files. It’s a generalization, to which there are always exceptions.

Yet again, Paul Randall has published an informative blog post around the usage of -TF1118: